Jump to Main ContentJump to Primary Navigation
Top

In praise of Star Trek

UINTO__CHRIS_PINE_sad15015.jpg

Nearly 50 years on, Star Trek is still seen by some as strictly for geeks. Jonathan Pile aims a Vulcan salute at an underrated franchise

Popularity is a bitch. And Star Trek is a victim of its own success. The show’s group of obsessive fans have given it a bad name. Specifically their name: Trekkies (or Trekkers, whichever of the two you’re compelled to use). It’s a byword for overweight virgins wearing thick glasses and Spock ears, still living with their parents and demanding an explanation about the planet in Episode 4 that spins westwards when we first see it, but eastwards later in the episode.

Of course, given the number of fans, if this sexless cliché were actually true, the future of the human race would be in serious jeopardy. And famous Trekkies include Daniel Craig, Angelina Jolie and Barack Obama. But still, even with the lens-flare-happy success of JJ Abrams’ 2009 update, it’s difficult to shake the idea that Star Trek’s utopian future ideals reside far from the acceptable face of sci-fi. You know, the one with lightsabers.

But it’s time to separate the type of person who dresses as Quark on dates (hello, Deep Space Nine fans) from the show they obsess over. They’re the reason the idea of being a Star Trek fan is socially dubious, not the programme. Admitting to liking The Killing would be far less acceptable if the world was crammed with overweight virgins wearing Sarah Lund jumpers and quoting the Danish for “Live long and prosper”.

The thing is, liking Star Trek is a broad idea anyway. What does it even mean? Do you like the creaky sets and progressive Sixties politics of the original series? The musings on the human condition popular in The Next Generation? The exploration of space in Voyager or Enterprise? The quips and action of JJ Abrams’ film?

Let’s begin with the original series that ran for three seasons in the Sixties. Yes most of the technology on the bridge of William Shatner’s Enterprise looks less futuristic than a Nokia 6110, but this was TV at its most forward-thinking.

The ship’s comms officer was Lieutenant Uhura – not just a woman, but a black woman. It might seem odd now, but her holding such a senior position was a unique proposition in the Sixties. And it wasn’t just that we were told she was as capable as the men on the ship, it played out in her actions, too.

She was also part of the first interracial kiss on US network TV – a plot point that so worried NBC executives, that two versions were scheduled to be filmed. But creator Gene Roddenberry and the actors in question, William Shatner (below) and Nichelle Nichols, conspired to film the kiss first, then deliberately fluff every take of the non-kiss scene to ensure it went out nationwide.

TO BOLDLY GO

But despite all this, personally, my Star Trek is The Next Generation – at 178 episodes, the longest-running of them all. If the original series pushed social boundaries, TNG demonstrated artistically what modern TV could achieve. It delivered recurring storylines that ran through the series, eventually paying off years later. The character of Q, an omnipotent being, puts humanity ‘on trial’ in the pilot. He’s a semi-regular antagonist, whose story is only concluded in the final episode when his trial ends. This is two decades before Lost won raves (and some jeers) for playing similar tricks.

In fact, it’s arguable TNG did it more successfully, allowing viewers to dip in and out without fear of missing a plot reveal that would explain why suddenly, after two-and-a-half seasons, there were two previously unseen jewel thieves among the survivors of Oceanic Flight 815.

Still, the reason we’re discussing this at all is due to the release of Star Trek Into Darkness, the sequel to the 2009 reboot (and yes, we’re using the term ‘reboot’. Because that’s what it is).

And here’s the thing: that was a film so good that after buying Lucasfilm for the Star Wars franchise, Disney hired JJ Abrams to direct Episode VII.

That’s right: Star Wars, the acceptable face of sci-fi geekery, is turning to Star Trek to erase the stench of the prequels and make it good again. Now that says a lot about how cool it’s become.

And even if you don’t think it is, that’s OK – Star Trek is doing just fine anyway.

Star Trek Into Darkness is at cinemas nationwide from 9 May

(Title image: Paramount Pictures, Allstar)

Related

man of steel.jpg

Cool new Man of Steel trailer

star trek into darkness.jpg

Awesome new Star Trek trailer

jj abrams hero.jpg

JJ Abrams

Comments

More

Watch the new trailer for Valerian & the City of a Thousand Planets

It stars Cara Delevingne, Clive Owen, Rihanna and Herbie Hancock

by Dave Fawbert
24 May 2017

People are remembering Roger Moore's amazing newspaper correction

The most classically Roger Moore moment you can imagine

by Dave Fawbert
24 May 2017

Tom Cruise says 'Top Gun 2' is 'definitely happening'

But when Tom? When?!

by Dave Fawbert
24 May 2017

This story about Roger Moore will bring happiness to your day

What a great man

by Gary Ogden
23 May 2017

Let's all watch Alan Partridge's reenactment of 'The Spy Who Loved Me'

"Stop getting Bond wrong!"

by Dave Fawbert
23 May 2017

Simon Pegg and Nick Frost are making a new comedy-horror together

It's called 'Slaughterhouse Rulez' and sounds A+

by Alex Finnis
17 May 2017

New trailer drops for 'War for the Planet of the Apes'

It all ends here

by Matt Tate
16 May 2017

Why are Adam Sandler's deliberately terrible movies so irresistible?

They constantly get terrible ratings, and yep keep making big money. What's Adam Sandler's secret?

by Josh Pappenheim
15 May 2017

Ian McShane: “I haven’t seen a lot of films I’ve done”

We spoke to the veteran actor, and tried not to get distracted by how good he smelled

by Ralph Jones
10 May 2017

'Get Out' has broken records by raking in $200 million worldwide

Jordan Peele has become the first African-American writer-director to have his debut movie pass the $200 million mark

by Gary Ogden
09 May 2017