

Later this month the Queen will become the longest serving monarch in British history, overtaking Queen Victoria.
That might sound like an incredible achievement but it’s not really that interesting. Old Liz has simply lived longer than someone who had no access to antibiotics.
The monarchs we find interesting are the mad ones and the bad ones. And now Henry VIII has been officially voted the worst of the lot.
In a survey conducted by the Historical Writers Association the wife-murdering glutton took 20 per cent of the vote. Robert Wilton, author of The Spider of Sarajevo, described the king “a gross man-child, wilfully and capriciously dangerous to everything around him including the country”.
Interestingly, the Queen’s uncle Edward VIII came in second worst with 14% of the vote ahead of John I and Charles I, who both got 8 per cent.
That seems a little harsh considering Edward was king for about ten minutes and John murdered the Archbishop of Canterbury and lost Normandy and Charles I was so bad that he had his head chopped off.
The other Elizabeth came out as the best monarch in history receiving 62 writers’ votes, whereas our queen received just one.
Get exclusive shortlists, celebrity interviews and the best deals on the products you care about, straight to your inbox.
That writer definitely has his eye on a knighthood.
As Shortlist’s Staff Writer, Danielle spends most of her time compiling lists of the best ways to avoid using the Central Line at rush hour.
-
Wimbledon's biggest ever upsets: 8 shocking tennis matches that no-one could have predicted
New balls, please...
-
The rarest animals, boxer shorts, and cosplaying Dune: 6 secrets from the stars of new Apple TV+ nature doc, The Wild Ones
It's like if David Attenborough and the Three Musketeers had a crossover