Jump to Main ContentJump to Primary Navigation
Top

Here's the reason you don't enjoy blockbusters like you used to

main.jpg

Did Jurassic World not deliver the T-Rex sized thrills the 1993 original once did? Still mulling over what to make of Marvel’s latest Avengers romp? Generally a bit underwhelmed by blockbusters being awash with CGI effects?

Well you’re not alone, and according to YouTube ciniphiles StoryBrain, it’s not just down to nostalgia either – there's actually something far deeper than that at play.

Twenty years ago, filmmakers would superimpose a CGI on a real scene, albeit with limited scope over what they could do. This effect lasted up until around 2004 when software passed the point where production teams could amalgamate individual CGI objects with fully rendered computer-generated backgrounds. Dubbed the WETA effect (after the studio that pioneered it), that basically allowed Avatar’s oversized surfs to run up trees without James Cameron needing to pick up a camera, theoretically speaking.

StoryBrain also claims that this is why many of the big scenes in last decade’s blockbusters can feel a bit blasé. Or why watching some action scenes can feel a bit like watching cut-scenes from a video game. To fully enjoy a film you need to suspend your disbelief, or else it gets blunted, then deep down, as you watch these scenes, a misunderstanding is occurring about the way your brain processes the images. In short: without a human element, or at least one stood behind a camera, you become apathetic to the story.

Believe it or not, backgrounds more than the main characters themselves have the ability to decide how realistic these films can be – well unless it’s Howard The Duck. Check out the example of 2003’s Hulk and its 2008 predecessor for proof of this. Spliced alongside each other to highlight the chasm in detail, it works in favour for the blander, earlier one if anything.

Which begs the question: did scriptwriters get lazy or was it the filmmakers?

We should point out, for balance, it is worth checking out this piece which argues that StoryBrain has no idea what its talking about. Either way, it's certainly provided food for thought.

Let us know your thoughts below.

Related

bond.jpg

James Bond musical in the works

money.jpeg

Fictional currencies get a real-life conversion

terminator2.png

A Complete Guide To All 15 Terminator Models

1.jpg

Fassbender frighteningly good in the second trailer for Steve Jobs

Rocky.jpg

First trailer for Rocky spin-off Creed

1.jpg

12 Little Known Facts About Superman

Comments

More

Netflix picks up Martin Scorsese's 'The Irishman'

Production is scheduled to begin next year

22 Feb 2017

'Star Wars' release the first cast photo from the Han Solo spin-off

You can't have too much Chewie

22 Feb 2017

Guillermo Del Toro ends the speculation about Hellboy 3

Big Red fans, it's not good news

21 Feb 2017

The ShortList Alternative Oscars

The only awards that really matter

by Gary Ogden
20 Feb 2017

Is Love Actually actually shit or brilliant?

Two writers argue their case for the divisive 2003 rom-com

16 Feb 2017

The totally excellent 19 facts you never knew about Wayne’s World

No way? Way.

by Keyan Milanian
16 Feb 2017

Details of the Star Wars: The Last Jedi teaser trailer 'leaked'

If it's true, Star Wars fans are in for a treat

14 Feb 2017

The best dressed men from the 2017 EE BAFTAs

As sartorially sharp as Stephen Fry's wit

13 Feb 2017

Ken Loach delivered a rousing anti Tory speech at the BAFTAs

The veteran filmmaker criticised the “callous brutality” of Theresa May's government

by Joe Ellison
13 Feb 2017

The 7 best titles new to UK Netflix this week

Get these on your tellybox

10 Feb 2017