Jump to Main ContentJump to Primary Navigation
Top

Here's the reason you don't enjoy blockbusters like you used to

main.jpg

Did Jurassic World not deliver the T-Rex sized thrills the 1993 original once did? Still mulling over what to make of Marvel’s latest Avengers romp? Generally a bit underwhelmed by blockbusters being awash with CGI effects?

Well you’re not alone, and according to YouTube ciniphiles StoryBrain, it’s not just down to nostalgia either – there's actually something far deeper than that at play.

Twenty years ago, filmmakers would superimpose a CGI on a real scene, albeit with limited scope over what they could do. This effect lasted up until around 2004 when software passed the point where production teams could amalgamate individual CGI objects with fully rendered computer-generated backgrounds. Dubbed the WETA effect (after the studio that pioneered it), that basically allowed Avatar’s oversized surfs to run up trees without James Cameron needing to pick up a camera, theoretically speaking.

StoryBrain also claims that this is why many of the big scenes in last decade’s blockbusters can feel a bit blasé. Or why watching some action scenes can feel a bit like watching cut-scenes from a video game. To fully enjoy a film you need to suspend your disbelief, or else it gets blunted, then deep down, as you watch these scenes, a misunderstanding is occurring about the way your brain processes the images. In short: without a human element, or at least one stood behind a camera, you become apathetic to the story.

Believe it or not, backgrounds more than the main characters themselves have the ability to decide how realistic these films can be – well unless it’s Howard The Duck. Check out the example of 2003’s Hulk and its 2008 predecessor for proof of this. Spliced alongside each other to highlight the chasm in detail, it works in favour for the blander, earlier one if anything.

Which begs the question: did scriptwriters get lazy or was it the filmmakers?

We should point out, for balance, it is worth checking out this piece which argues that StoryBrain has no idea what its talking about. Either way, it's certainly provided food for thought.

Let us know your thoughts below.

Related

bond.jpg

James Bond musical in the works

money.jpeg

Fictional currencies get a real-life conversion

terminator2.png

A Complete Guide To All 15 Terminator Models

1.jpg

Fassbender frighteningly good in the second trailer for Steve Jobs

Rocky.jpg

First trailer for Rocky spin-off Creed

1.jpg

12 Little Known Facts About Superman

Comments

More

GI Joe is getting another reboot, but this time it's 'millennial'

Hasbro isn't saying what that means, but we're assuming the Joes will be drinking lattes while refusing to save for a house

by Tom Mendelsohn
24 Mar 2017

The new film from the guy behind 'In Bruges' looks brilliant

Even the trailer's hilarious

by Gary Ogden
24 Mar 2017

Han Solo's real name isn't actually Han Solo, Disney reveal

Disney's president stuns the fandom with the news that everyone's favourite smuggler might not quite be who he says he is

by Tom Mendelsohn
24 Mar 2017

Cinema hands out sick bags to people watching new cannibal horror film

It's got an 88% Rotten Tomatoes rating, too

by Matt Tate
23 Mar 2017

Ryan Gosling has finally revealed why he was laughing at the Oscars

He had the best reaction of the night

by Gary Ogden
23 Mar 2017

Watch the first five minutes of Ghost In The Shell now

Looks pretty decent tbf

by Gary Ogden
22 Mar 2017

You can now search for movies on Sky Q by yelling at your remote

"Luke, I'm your mum!"

by Gary Ogden
22 Mar 2017

Ridley Scott wants to make another four movies after 'Alien: Covenant'

We could be staring down the barrel of ten Alien movies

by Tom Mendelsohn
21 Mar 2017

'Rogue One: A Star Wars Story' ditched a much more hopeful ending

What could have been for Jyn and Cassian

by Matt Tate
21 Mar 2017

John Boyega and Mark Hamill are trolling Star Wars fans on Twitter

Daddy?

by Matt Tate
20 Mar 2017