Jump to Main ContentJump to Primary Navigation
Top

Jeremy Corbyn would never use nukes if he were Prime Minister

1.jpg

Launching a nuclear weapon at a country must be a horrifying act. In one press of a button, or utterance down a phone, you are effectively causing the obliteration of millions within the blink of an eye.

No British Prime Minister has ever had to experience this pressure - and now we know that if Jeremy Corbyn were to ever enter No.10, that record would remain intact.

Quizzed on BBC Radio 4’s Today Programme as to whether he would ever press the big red button if he were PM, the new Labour leader flatly replied, "No," reminding the panel that "We are not in the era of the Cold War anymore; it finished a long time ago."

"I am opposed to the use of nuclear weapons. I am opposed to the holding of nuclear weapons. I want to see a nuclear-free world. I believe it is possible,” he added, referring to his continued stance on not renewing Britain’s Trident program.

With the maverick under pressure to win over the centre left backbenchers and unite his fractured party at this week’s Labour conference, his comments on Trident might not exactly help this goal. Particularly as it comes just days after one of his biggest backers during the Labour election, Unite's General Secretary Len McCluskey, said his group would be voting to keep Trident, as cutting the multi-billion pound system would cost jobs.

And lest we forget the possible MILITARY COUP one army general recently said would happen if Corbyn were to take the reins of power. For Corbyn, this issue could well be the defining moment of his candidacy, but should he have even raised it? 

After all, while certainly a refreshing discourse to have on nuclear weapons, which could very well one day end the world as we know it, perhaps he might have been better avoiding the hypotheticals over nukes, saying he’ll merely cross that bridge and potentially blow it to smithereens when he comes to it.

What if we’re double bluffing anyway? What if, unbeknownst to us, Trident was scrapped long ago and we’re now just charting empty subs around so the likes of Putin and Jong-Un think we’re still some sort of world power. An empty deterrent.

Let us know your thoughts on Trident below.

Related

KIM.jpg

Kim Jong-Un Is Threatening To Kill Everybody In America (Again)

0.5.jpg

David Cameron apologises for #piggate

1.png

Now The Russian Embassy Is Trolling David Cameron Over Pig Gate

Comments

More

Here are the words that other countries use to describe relationships

All the terms that would be much better to describe your 'life partner'

by David Cornish
05 Dec 2016

You’ll soon be able to test the purity of your cocaine and MDMA

by Alex Christian
05 Dec 2016

Vets want people to stop drinking at home for the sake of their pets

Your furry friends have a taste for the good stuff... and that's a problem

by Chris Sayer
05 Dec 2016

American hipster dads are demanding to be called 'papa'

by Ralph Jones
05 Dec 2016

America is now making educational adverts to prevent teen shootings

Funny that nowhere else has this problem...

by Sam Diss
05 Dec 2016

Watch this man rescue a dog by punching a kangaroo in the face

Probably the most Australian thing you'll ever see

by Emily Badiozzaman
05 Dec 2016

Bertolucci admits 'Last Tango in Paris' rape scene was non-consensual

He says he feels guilt, but no regret

by Emily Badiozzaman
05 Dec 2016

What does our love of fighting tell us about ourselves?

Why can't we stop watching people pummel each other?

02 Dec 2016

Widower, 89, offered bar job after "stop me dying from boredom" ad

He feels like he’s “won a thousand bucks on the horses”

by Chris Sayer
02 Dec 2016

You can now hire the services of deadly cyber hackers

Rent an army of infected bots and cause untold online havoc

02 Dec 2016