Jump to Main ContentJump to Primary Navigation

Your employers can now legally read your private messages at work


Judges at the European Court of Human Rights have backed a firm that accessed a worker's private messages sent via chat software and webmail accounts during working hours - and the ruling applies to the UK.

Bogdan Barbulescu, an engineer in Romania was sacked by his employer in 2007 after it accessed his messages on what it believed was a work Yahoo Messenger account and discovered that there were personal contacts as well as professional ones on there. The firm had banned its staff from sending personal messages at work - and, indeed, had stated that employees were not to use the internet for anything but work.

Barbulescu had previously lost the case in Romanian courts and had appealed to the European Court of Human Rights, arguing that his right to a private life had been breached, but the courts upheld the ruling, saying that the company had warned him that they could check his messages, and that in order to check his account, it was necessary for the employer to access his records.

They said that it was not "unreasonable that an employer would want to verify that employees were completing their professional tasks during working hours", adding that "the employer acted within its disciplinary powers since, as the domestic courts found, it had accessed the Yahoo Messenger account on the assumption that the information in question had been related to professional activities and that such access had therefore been legitimate. The court sees no reason to question these findings."

Interestingly, the company also accessed messages on a second personal account - however, the judges only discussed the work account in their ruling, so it is not known whether a company would be allowed to read personal messages on a personal account. In addition, the device used to send the messages was owned by the company - nothing was said about whether the ruling would have been different had a personal device been used. Currently, UK law dictates that employers can only access personal emails in exceptional circumstances - such as to prevent criminal activity.

One of the eight judges present did not agree with the decision, arguing that a blanket ban on personal internet use was not acceptable.

UK law allows 'proportionate checks on employees' communications' - so if your company policy explicitly prohibits internet use for personal matters, then it looks like the courts will not be in your favour, should disciplinary action result from that cheeky chat with your mates.

[via BBC]

(Image: Shutterstock)



Your boss could be spying on you right now and here's how


Study says being sarcastic can make you more creative


16 signs your co-workers secretly hate you


Flight attendants share the 25 worst things passengers do

How many of them are you guilty of?

by Gary Ogden
16 Aug 2017

Obama's response to Charlottesville is now the most-liked tweet ever

Puts Trump's response to shame

by Emily Reynolds
16 Aug 2017

English accents have been ranked by sexiness - where is yours?

You lot up north will be happy

by Gary Ogden
16 Aug 2017

Unmissable TV shows Reddit says you have to watch before you die

From gritty dramas to kids' classics

by Emily Reynolds
15 Aug 2017

The surprising side-effect of spending just 5 minutes on Facebook

It only takes five minutes of Facebooking

by Emily Reynolds
15 Aug 2017

Uber is going to start charging you for making your driver wait

Your cab home's about to get a bit more pricey

by Carl Anka
15 Aug 2017

John Oliver takes down Trump over his comments on Charlottesville

Doing what he does best

by Gary Ogden
14 Aug 2017

This amputee has the best Tinder profile ever

You've gotta hand it to her

11 Aug 2017

Ginger emojis are finally coming!

Justice is finally being done

by Emily Reynolds
11 Aug 2017

Why 'Get a House for Free' is an unintentionally important watch

We can't solve the housing crisis by giving away flats on television

by Tristan Cross
11 Aug 2017