Jump to Main ContentJump to Primary Navigation
Top

Here’s what’s actually inside burgers (and it’s a little bit gross)

Burger.jpg

Sometimes, science, we wish you’d just keep your big clever mouth shut.

In what are perhaps the least shocking experiment results ever, scientists in America have found traces of foreign DNAs lurking in our prized patties. Well, duh.

Food analysts from US laboratory Clear Labs conducted a pretty awesomely-named study called The Hamburger Report, in which they tested 258 burgers for traces of stuff that shouldn’t be there.

The study revealed a number of, um, off-the-menu items. One of which was human DNA.

But before you all pledge your allegiance to the altar of the vegetarian, just chill out a second. Human DNA was found in only one of the 258 samples, and was most likely a hair or a flake of skin that made its was in by accident. That, inevitably, happens when you’ve got a real-life human making your food, and not a soon-to-take-over-the-world robot. And only one in two hundred and fifty eight? In all honesty, we’d expected that to be way, waaay higher.

One point to the burgers.

 Unfortunately, things turn a little bit grosser from here on in. Perhaps go watch this funny egg-related prank instead of reading on if you’re planning on chowing on a Big Mac this lunchtime.

In three cases scientists found really-not-tasty rat DNA. Yeah, that’s grim. On top of that, 4.3% of the tests showed traces of pathogenic DNA. What’s a pathogenic DNA, we hear you ponder? Oh, it’s only the stuff that causes food poisoning. In four samples, Clear Labs stumbled across Yersinia pseudotuberculosis – a pathogen that causes tuberculosis-type symptoms. Oh, good.

Then, there was the black bean burger that had absolutely no black bean DNA in it whatsoever. Quite impressive, really.

Rat DNA and horrible illness germs aside, and in all honesty, these results have failed to shock us. We all know that when we pick up a cheap crappy burger at 3am after a big night out, we’re not holding a handful of pure clean-living Jamie Oliver goodness. We all know it’s wrong. We all know it’s dirty. But we all choose to not think about the badness and instead crack on with enjoying a stack of cheese, mayonnaise, meat and whatever the hell else has snuck between the buns in trace amounts.

Are these results way better or far worse than you first anticipated? Tell us in our poll below…

 

 

Related

WeberCleanGrill.jpg

11 tricks, tips and hacks that’ll make you a BBQ legend this summer

big_mac_burgers.jpg

McDonald's is tinkering with the Big Mac formula

kfc.jpg

Investigation finds faecal matter in KFC ice

Comments

More

13 best, lesser-known rooftop bars in London

#rooftopvibes

by Sam Diss
24 May 2017

15 of the most incredible sandwiches you can eat in London

Get your chops around these - if they even fit

by Tom Victor
19 May 2017

The avocado latte is the latest worst thing in the world

We deserve everything we get, as long as it's bad

by Tom Mendelsohn
19 May 2017

You can now buy Cadbury Freddo hot chocolate, so put the kettle on

Please don't start talking about the price, though

by Gary Ogden
18 May 2017

Hello, so... this is a Chickle

Can't decide if this is good or bad

by Gary Ogden
18 May 2017

There's now a pill that'll cure your hangover

As if you needed any more encouragement to drink irresponsibly

by Emily Reynolds
17 May 2017

Reviewing all 10 burgers on the Wahlburgers menu in one sitting

And which is the best on offer?

by Josh Pappenheim
17 May 2017

Starbucks are testing 'coffee ice cubes' to end your watery woes

It's been a long time coming

by Emily Reynolds
17 May 2017

Labour have pledged to try and save the pub

Could a Corbyn government stop the rot?

by Dave Fawbert
17 May 2017

Is it a sandwich? A definitive (and correct) guide

Is a hot dog a sandwich?

by Tom Victor
17 May 2017